Key developments

Luxembourg

Luxembourg

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
    • Luxembourg Due Diligence Initiative (“Initiative pour un devoir de vigilance au Luxembourg”) campaign proposes human rights due diligence legislation to cover all companies headquatered in Luxemburg.

More information ×
International Bodies

International Bodies

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Europe

Europe

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Australia

Australia

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Canada

Canada

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
    • Choc v. Hudbay Minerals Inc.: Ontario Superior Court permitted the claims to proceed on the basis that it was not "plain and obvious" that Hudbay did not owe a duty of care to the plaintiff (ongoing).
    • Araya v. Nevsun Resources: British Columbia Supreme Court decision to allow the claim to go to trial (2016, ongoing).
    • Garcia v. Tahoe Resources: British Columbia Court of Appeal allowed case to go trial (2017, ongoing).
    • Yaiguaje v. Chevron Corporation: Ontario Court of Appeal will review a request filed by Chevron Canada arguing Chevron Canada is a separate entity and can’t be held liable for the judgment against its parent (ongoing).
More information ×
Finland

Finland

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
France

France

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Germany

Germany

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Italy

Italy

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Netherlands

Netherlands

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
Sweden

Sweden

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development

    Arica v. BolidenChilean claimants allege that they suffered harm, including adverse health and environmental impacts, as a result of the negligent dumping and mismanagement of toxic waste in Chile by Swedish company Boliden. Ruling handed down March 8th in favour of the defendants, but the claimants intend to appeal.

    Swedish Agency for Public Management report recommends Government implement Human Rights Due Diligence obligations for Swedish companies.
     

More information ×
Switzerland

Switzerland

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
United Kingdom

United Kingdom

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
    • Chandler v. Cape: Parent company deemed to have a duty of care owned to subsidiary’s employees (2012).
    • Lungowe v. Vedanta: Court of Appeal upheld a High Court ruling allowing a case brought by Zambian villagers against UK mining firm Vedanta to continue to be heard in UK courts.
    • Okpabi v. Shell: Court rejected parent company responsibility for damage caused by its subsidiary. Claimants appealed (2016, ongoing).
    • AAA v. Unilever: Court found that claims against Unilever did not have arguable merit, but helped confirm developing doctrine of parent company liability and jurisdiction of courts over subsidiary. 
    • UK Parliament’s Joint Committee for Human Rights calls for legislation to impose on all companies a duty to prevent human rights abuses (2017).
More information ×
United States

United States

  • Ongoing process
  • Finalised process
  • Law
  • Legal Case
  • Policy development
More information ×
This map shows legislative measures, judicial proceedings, authoritative guidance, institutional recommendations, reports, and policy statements which aim to embed companies’ responsibility to respect human rights across their global operations into law. The map does not, nor does it intend to, present a comprehensive compilation of all existing developments in this field. Its purpose is to highlight only mandatory measures, relevant judicial proceedings and decisions, and actionable political commitments. In this way, it demonstrates the growing acceptance of mandatory human rights due diligence (HRDD) and judicial solutions to holding parent companies in home states accountable for human rights abuses throughout their operations.